From: Jeffrey Carter <spam@spam.com>
Subject: Re: Turning off "Unit xxx not referenced" warnings?
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 18:56:41 GMT
Date: 2004-10-29T18:56:41+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Jnwgd.10951$KJ6.7115@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1099043512.777330.230800@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
ggroups@steelskies.com wrote:
> I have a file which with's a bunch of other files purely to force their
> elaboration.
> As a result, I get a number of "Unit xxx not referenced" warnings. Is
> there any way to get rid of them?
> There's a compiler switch which turns the warning off, but I'd prefer
> to do it on a per-file basis. Is there not a pragma or something for
> this?
A portable way is to mention each in a pragma Elaborate (or
Elaborate_Body). That may be a good way to do it, since it emphasizes
that they are there in order to be elaborated.
--
Jeff Carter
"I like it when the support group complains that they have
insufficient data on mean time to repair bugs in Ada software."
Robert I. Eachus
91
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-29 18:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-29 9:51 Turning off "Unit xxx not referenced" warnings? ggroups
2004-10-29 10:54 ` Martin Dowie
2004-10-29 14:22 ` Nick Roberts
2004-10-29 17:47 ` Martin Dowie
2004-10-30 14:51 ` Simon Wright
2004-11-02 9:21 ` Alex R. Mosteo
2004-11-02 21:58 ` Simon Wright
2004-10-29 18:56 ` Jeffrey Carter [this message]
2004-11-03 0:54 ` Georg Bauhaus
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox