From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,aee8ed05a978aff9
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.megapath.net!news.megapath.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 16:19:34 -0500
From: "Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
References: <Vx33d.3580$d5.27722@newsb.telia.net>
 <8119488.4vhKC6FDza@linux1.krischik.com> <x7visaa4i2b.fsf@smaug.pushface.org>
 <2617548.neE1jZqPik@linux1.krischik.com>
 <S8B3d.3680$d5.28757@newsb.telia.net>
Subject: Re: Is this definition legal?
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 16:20:28 -0500
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4910.0300
Message-ID: <Nr-dnXUM25H01NLcRVn-iA@megapath.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.32.209.38
X-Trace: 
 sv3-qbYFNUFtpLD5TWoMOM1UxltdWjVS5HKlLFxDGCIOGHYAB3A1lt9V91s5+pz2y4wOAH4635h1g4amt9Q!c91eU/UJpd/92tJdjyh9ZL5DRlBOb9u1x9YZjZlb7vdnx9Ryq06Mte870wwqULtwLk6sFMtHKOua
X-Complaints-To: abuse@megapath.net
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@megapath.net
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint
 properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.13
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3877
Date: 2004-09-20T16:20:28-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Bj�rn Persson" <spam-away@nowhere.nil> wrote in message
news:S8B3d.3680$d5.28757@newsb.telia.net...

>I thought Ada-comment would be appropriate if I could point to a
>paragraph in the reference manual that needed clarification. That's not
>the case.

You're right in the sense that Ada-Comment is not a place for asking random
questions about code. If a compiler had rejected the code and cited some
paragraph in the standard, you certainly could (and should) ask about it.
But its definitely not a place to discuss bug boxes in particular compilers.

               Randy Brukardt
               ARG Editor