From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,9bb56e94a4c5bb5e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!wn14feed!worldnet.att.net!12.120.4.37!attcg2!ip.att.net!news.binc.net!kilgallen From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: How unchecked conversion works? Date: 15 Jan 2005 06:02:53 -0600 Organization: LJK Software Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1105790476 13048 192.135.80.34 (15 Jan 2005 12:01:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 12:01:16 +0000 (UTC) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:7803 Date: 2005-01-15T06:02:53-06:00 List-Id: In article , Marius Amado Alves writes: >> Was there any statement that predictability across environments >> was a goal ? > > No environment, compiler, or operating system was identified. This > indicates a portable solution was sought. No security environment was specified, so I shall presume something that can be evaluated at the current equivalent of "A1" is required. Furthermore, I will presume this has to run on Microsoft Windows. Can you see how making such assumptions is flawed ?