From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,131ac66ded247fcc X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!newsfeed-00.mathworks.com!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!newsfeed.multikabel.nl!newsfeeder.concepts.nl!193.201.147.73.MISMATCH!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!transit.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 16:50:09 +0100 From: Colin Paul Gloster Subject: Re: Is there a translator from SPARK Ada to VHDL? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <2e9040a1.0501201544.553ad2ac@posting.google.com> X-X-Sender: NULL@news1.news.xs4all.nl MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.84.206.176 X-Trace: 1109519246 news.xs4all.nl 28987 [::ffff:213.84.206.176]:10269 X-Complaints-To: abuse@xs4all.nl Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:8513 Date: 2005-02-27T16:50:09+01:00 List-Id: On Fri, 20 Jan 2005, Stephen Leake wrote: "VHDL has a similar syntax to Ada, but it is really a different language; the semantics are oriented towards parallel processing of many small gates, as opposed to serial processing of one main processor. [..]" Behavorial VHDL and the equivalent of representation clauses do resemble Ada, but synthesizable VHDL (as opposed to VHDL for simulators -- one of the funny things about VHDL and Verilog, so much work put into a supposed simulation without tool support for reification) is not parallel.