From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!peer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post01.iad.highwinds-media.com!fx19.iad.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Shark8 <OneWingedShark@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64;
 rv:30.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/30.0a1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: why the pascal family of languages (Pascal, Ada,
 Modula-2,2,Oberon,
 Delphi, Algol,...) failed compared to the C family?
References: <lq5qv9$hhk$1@speranza.aioe.org>
 <53cab152$0$32501$862e30e2@ngroups.net>
 <5f6c4a25-4ed9-4b0e-bb60-199d012ee0d0@googlegroups.com>
 <YpXyv.43395$Y37.8974@fx22.iad>
 <bbcc5ccc-0c41-4292-b1c3-cd86dbf3a098@googlegroups.com>
 <_0Yyv.78778$bf2.37679@fx24.iad>
 <641a3aaa-800e-4567-a0e8-ebdb63c4bfdb@googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <641a3aaa-800e-4567-a0e8-ebdb63c4bfdb@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-ID: <Vd_yv.35819$46.22711@fx19.iad>
X-Complaints-To: abuse@teranews.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 01:42:13 UTC
Organization: TeraNews.com
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2014 19:42:11 -0600
X-Received-Bytes: 1826
X-Received-Body-CRC: 977959044
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:21087
Date: 2014-07-20T19:42:11-06:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 20-Jul-14 17:21, Dan'l Miller wrote:
> On Sunday, July 20, 2014 6:11:54 PM UTC-5, Shark8 wrote:
>> On 20-Jul-14 16:51, gautier wrote:
>>> Le lundi 21 juillet 2014 00:30:14 UTC+2, Shark8 a �crit :
>> Ah, I see...
>> I went to http://www.gnavi.org/ and it seems like the last update
>> [there] was circa 2004.
>
> Gnavi does an especially bad job with PR.  Gnavi really needs to
> update their musty-crusty old website at gnavi.org with modernized
> content.  Go here instead for activity that is 10 years more
> recent:  http://sourceforge.net/projects/gnavi
>

My virus scanner is flagging the setup there (GWindows Setup 
5-Apr-2014.exe) as infected... is this a false-positive, or did it 
infect sourceforge?