From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII X-Google-Thread: 103376,beb6b378a857b7ea X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-12-21 14:55:41 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!195.86.7.162!newsfeed.wirehub.nl!btnet-peer!btnet-peer0!btnet!news5-gui.server.ntli.net!ntli.net!news6-win.server.ntlworld.com.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "martin.m.dowie" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada References: <4948089f.0112180828.2ea4c80@posting.google.com> <4948089f.0112192354.5411f0ed@posting.google.com> <9vti1h$183d$1@not.sics.se> Subject: Re: Use of entries using Ravenscar X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Message-ID: Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 22:47:52 -0000 NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.104.124.189 X-Complaints-To: abuse@ntlworld.com X-Trace: news6-win.server.ntlworld.com 1008975032 213.104.124.189 (Fri, 21 Dec 2001 22:50:32 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 22:50:32 GMT Organization: ntlworld News Service Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:18239 Date: 2001-12-21T22:47:52+00:00 List-Id: "Jimmy Dub�n" wrote in message news:9vti1h$183d$1@not.sics.se... > > Task entries are forbidden but not PO entries but you're only allowed > > one queued entry at a time... > > But this surely does only have one queued entry, right? One entry but my understanding of Ravenscar is that only 1 task may be queued on this single entry at any one time, so without the rest of your code, we can't make any judgement on that. > > The other thing I noticed was that nothing in the code actually > > required this unit to be withed in at all. (true of a couple of other > > with's and they certainly don't need to be withed in at the spec > > level - with things at as low a level as possible). > > How can that affect the compiler errors? Well, I've never seen it with GNAT but I did come across another compiler which would did have some strange ideas about what to compile :-) That was a couple of years ago and there have definately been new releases of that compiler, so I can say if these "features" are still there! I presume you are using a Unix/Linux machine? On Win32 there is a complaint about trying to attach the ISR but no sign of your original problem, with or without the spurious "with"s. Sorry :-(