From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 2002:a6b:f49:: with SMTP id x70-v6mr1820424ioi.107.1526002353209; Thu, 10 May 2018 18:32:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a9d:5a0a:: with SMTP id v10-v6mr175840oth.13.1526002352865; Thu, 10 May 2018 18:32:32 -0700 (PDT) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.linkpendium.com!news.linkpendium.com!news.snarked.org!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!u74-v6no86285itb.0!news-out.google.com!f20-v6ni1itd.0!nntp.google.com!u74-v6no86284itb.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 18:32:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87h8nfyu40.fsf@nightsong.com> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2a02:1206:45c6:8b20:c002:a7b2:6814:bdbe; posting-account=gRqrnQkAAAAC_02ynnhqGk1VRQlve6ZG NNTP-Posting-Host: 2a02:1206:45c6:8b20:c002:a7b2:6814:bdbe References: <322f9b26-01de-4753-bb50-6ef2f3d993d8@googlegroups.com> <87a7th9pd1.fsf@nightsong.com> <87h8no1nli.fsf@nightsong.com> <874ljo1hvy.fsf@nightsong.com> <87vac4z2lh.fsf@nightsong.com> <87lgcszjdn.fsf@nightsong.com> <87sh6z1kkg.fsf@nightsong.com> <87k1sb1dt3.fsf@nightsong.com> <87h8nfyu40.fsf@nightsong.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: How to get Ada to ?cross the chasm?? From: gautier_niouzes@hotmail.com Injection-Date: Fri, 11 May 2018 01:32:33 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:52238 Date: 2018-05-10T18:32:32-07:00 List-Id: It's very kind from everybody here to think about deployment and other aspects of the CBSG. Actually the compile time (a few seconds on a "normal" machine) is perfectly fine for something that is updated a small number of times a year. The selection of new words takes a lot more than the compile time - browsing lengthy brochures, pick catchy words or expressions... So there is no need to worry at all about the compilation phase. On the run time side, the generation of the online page ( http://cbsg.sf.net ) takes around 1/1000 second (time is displayed at the bottom), so there is no rush to tune anything there.