From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!o7g2000yqb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: AdaMagica <christoph.grein@eurocopter.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Learning Ada
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 23:23:36 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <a988342e-a7cb-4819-9565-be9b1c8a4dc4@o7g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
References: <59O1m.404661$4m1.69194@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
	<ba7f8fc3-e386-49cc-a1fb-e53f7e1f04bf@d32g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
	<T0t4m.423818$4m1.53185@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
	<h2tun7$bpp$1@news.albasani.net>
 <X9u5m.431281$4m1.337519@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 91.13.229.29
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1247207016 24000 127.0.0.1 (10 Jul 2009 06:23:36
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 06:23:36 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: o7g2000yqb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=91.13.229.29;
	posting-account=rmHyLAoAAADSQmMWJF0a_815Fdd96RDf
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.9.0.11)
	Gecko/2009060215 Firefox/3.0.11,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:6930
Date: 2009-07-09T23:23:36-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 10 Jul., 00:28, a...@anon.org (anon) wrote:
> If Ada RM A.2 ( 4 ), applied here, then Adacore / GNAT would not allow one
> to compile the a Standard package. When compiling the Ada.* you must use
> "-gnatpg", command option, but compiling the Standard package is as easy
> as compiling any non-vendor or Ada package.

A.2(4) In the standard mode, it is illegal to compile a child of
package Ada.

So what on earth are you talking about? Your Standard package is not a
child of Ada nor is the RM package Standard a child of Ada.

Any user-written library unit, so also your Standard, can ve viewed as
a child of the RM Standard, as Frank Lhota has explained. No one
claimed that it was illegal in standard mode to compile a package
called Standard.

Do you ever take the time to understand other's posts?