From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.182.70.74 with SMTP id k10mr5379058obu.34.1405265363166;
        Sun, 13 Jul 2014 08:29:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.182.241.227 with SMTP id wl3mr62429obc.7.1405265363048; Sun,
 13 Jul 2014 08:29:23 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.glorb.com!h18no325312igc.0!news-out.google.com!bp9ni7igb.0!nntp.google.com!h18no984729igc.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2014 08:29:22 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <lpr3cf$b1s$1@speranza.aioe.org>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=71.252.147.203;
 posting-account=zwxLlwoAAAChLBU7oraRzNDnqQYkYbpo
NNTP-Posting-Host: 71.252.147.203
References: <lo3v28$tc4$1@speranza.aioe.org>
 <aac65d5e-4668-44d6-8b51-6a22ec677824@googlegroups.com>
 <lpr3cf$b1s$1@speranza.aioe.org>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <aa0290e4-b4dc-45ac-9c46-dac9e2daa11f@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: "The Machine" and Ada (blog post)
From: "Dan'l Miller" <optikos@verizon.net>
Injection-Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2014 15:29:23 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:20913
Date: 2014-07-13T08:29:22-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Saturday, July 12, 2014 5:41:15 AM UTC-5, Victor Porton wrote:
> Dan'l Miller wrote:
> > On Saturday, June 21, 2014 7:50:18 AM UTC-5, Victor Porton wrote:
> > why is Ada better suited for HP's new computer architecture than, say, C ...
> 
> In C it is needed a sophisticated code analysis to understand which part of 
> the program to compile with which instruction sets, for every file it is 
> need to be specified explicitly (or derived by a sophisticated code analysis 
> tool). With Ada it is easier: The compiler just compiles all dependencies of 
> a task to the right instruction set (as specified in the task's pragma).

To which existing pragma are you referring?