From: "Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester" <Master_Fontaine_is_dishonest@Strand_in_London.Gov.UK>
Subject: Re: on Ada abtract data type vs. OOP.
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 18:25:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ad095565-3111-a7ad-509f-7e7071677852@Insomnia247.NL> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <tff174$1qc6$1@gioia.aioe.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 758 bytes --]
On Fri, 9 Sep 2022, Nasser M. Abbasi wrote:
"What do other think about this subject? Do you think it is
better to do it as OOP,"
OOP is poop.
A lecturer who professes to be an OO lecturer used to lecture us
putatively on OO. He lectured on "They Write The Right Stuff" about the
space shuttles' software. This subsidy fraudster chose to not publish that
the space shuttles' software is not even supposedly OOP code. (It is also
not in Ada. This putative university never even mentions the name of the
language of space-shuttle software.) As we used to have only 1
Ada-engineer student, this lecturer said that for an OOP assessment, we
were permitted to use "Ada at a pinch."
With best regards.
Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-19 16:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-09 9:32 on Ada abtract data type vs. OOP Nasser M. Abbasi
2022-09-09 10:49 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2022-09-09 14:37 ` antispam
2022-09-09 15:21 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2022-09-09 15:30 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2022-09-09 14:04 ` Jeffrey R.Carter
2022-09-09 15:06 ` antispam
2022-09-11 8:02 ` G.B.
2024-04-19 16:25 ` Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester [this message]
2024-04-19 22:05 ` Lawrence D'Oliveiro
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox