From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,c406e0c4a6eb74ed X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!xmission!nnrp.xmission!adam.ruth From: Adam Ruth Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: ADA Popularity Discussion Request Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 06:29:41 -0600 Organization: InterCation, inc. Message-ID: References: <49dc98cf.0408110556.18ae7df@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 166.70.154.50 X-Trace: news.xmission.com 1092313783 430 166.70.154.50 (12 Aug 2004 12:29:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@xmission.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2004 12:29:43 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.2 (PPC Mac OS X) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2688 Date: 2004-08-12T06:29:41-06:00 List-Id: In article , Larry Elmore wrote: > fabio de francesco wrote: > > > > I can't imagine anything less readable than Perl. I see it like the > > exact opposite of Ada for that. > > J is definitely harder to read than Perl. It's a descendent of APL, but > replaced the special symbols with combinations of punctuation symbols. > Like APL, you can write some incredible one-liners, but even you won't > be able to easily figure out what it does a week later. > > http://www.jsoftware.com > > --Larry I think that BF wins, hands down, for the hardest to read language. WARNING: THIS PAGE CONTAINS A NAUGHTY WORD, PROCEED AT YOUR OWN RISK. http://www.muppetlabs.com/~breadbox/bf/ -- Adam Ruth adamruth at mac dot com