From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5-pre1 (2020-06-20) on ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5-pre1 X-Received: by 2002:aed:20a3:: with SMTP id 32mr3087919qtb.238.1616064456794; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 03:47:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a25:c943:: with SMTP id z64mr11146259ybf.73.1616064456620; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 03:47:36 -0700 (PDT) Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 03:47:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=94.31.102.170; posting-account=rmHyLAoAAADSQmMWJF0a_815Fdd96RDf NNTP-Posting-Host: 94.31.102.170 References: <89128f73-fcc5-4e57-8067-d09877ba0211n@googlegroups.com> <6ca041f3-2669-4497-9548-2f17666702a6n@googlegroups.com> <26c44e00-a899-455a-a929-1e23c7935fe3n@googlegroups.com> <9abb081d-a323-466d-9ae8-a2fc8fa24725n@googlegroups.com> <9933c99a-46b1-4541-aa15-f5c23e92b037n@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: array from static predicate on enumerated type From: AdaMagica Injection-Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 10:47:36 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:61612 List-Id: Niklas Holsti schrieb am Donnerstag, 18. M=C3=A4rz 2021 um 11:15:34 UTC+1: > There have been suggestions and discussion here of an "Ada successor"=20 > language, and Dmitry in particular thinks that the type system should be= =20 > completely overhauled for such a new language. It's even unclear what Dmitry's type system would look like. He never poste= d a set of rules (not necessarily complete) that could be discussed. He onl= y points out deficiencies of Ada's as he sees them. Seeing deficiencies is a valid standpoint, Ada certainly has some, but we c= annot discuss an alternative model without a set of requirements such a mod= el shall fulfil. Currently there is none.