From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Tero Koskinen Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Is this a bug? Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2020 14:19:56 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1d96e0e1-7700-4947-9fcb-051a1203c703@googlegroups.com> <8bc80421-29fb-4f19-baf0-b14680a99c32@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net I5kJ4ZXVHKvm5xpirm6Pygaz0SRmIqnb6aNULkcvUAgpVmZcOO Cancel-Lock: sha1:Js2sjB3gfjtRfkVikNyRKdLQalo= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 PostboxApp/7.0.10 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:57795 Date: 2020-01-06T14:19:56+02:00 List-Id: Hi, J-P. Rosen wrote on 6.1.2020 12.43: > Le 05/01/2020 à 14:32, reinert a écrit : >> I have just started to try it out using gnatcheck.aru as rule file :-) > > This is not the best option to start from, as it provides only the > AdaControl equivalent of Gnatcheck rules - so you won't benefit from the > many extra possibilities of AdaControl ;-). This file is intended to > ease migration from Gnatcheck to AdaControl . > > A good starting point is verif.aru (common rules) or nasa.aru (nasa > coding guidelines) in directory "rules". My Ahven library also has a set of AdaControl rules: https://hg.sr.ht/~tkoskine/ahven/browse/default/rules/ahven.aru Yours, Tero