From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:12c4:: with SMTP id e4mr23382051qkl.359.1575931634547; Mon, 09 Dec 2019 14:47:14 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:aca:72cd:: with SMTP id p196mr1240661oic.99.1575931634393; Mon, 09 Dec 2019 14:47:14 -0800 (PST) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.gegeweb.eu!gegeweb.org!usenet-fr.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!g89no10425953qtd.0!news-out.google.com!w29ni756qtc.0!nntp.google.com!g89no10425943qtd.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2019 14:47:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=146.5.2.231; posting-account=lJ3JNwoAAAAQfH3VV9vttJLkThaxtTfC NNTP-Posting-Host: 146.5.2.231 References: User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Type naming conventions: Any_Foo From: Shark8 Injection-Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2019 22:47:14 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:57700 Date: 2019-12-09T14:47:14-08:00 List-Id: On Sunday, December 8, 2019 at 2:58:21 PM UTC-7, Jeffrey R. Carter wrote: > On 12/8/19 3:31 PM, Shark8 wrote: > >=20 > > I'm rather interested in this no-access-type library idea. > > Would it be easier to do with, say, an Ada implementation of Display Po= stScript? >=20 > That might work, though I thought there were licensing issues with using= =20 > PostScript. There might have been, at one point; but IIUC Adobe made the language-spec/= RM free to download... which means we could implement it ourselves; this, i= n turn, means that we could implement it without [exposed] access types. --= IIRC, it's been a while since I've read the spec. > I've heard that Apple does something similar with PDF because anyone=20 > is allowed to produce PDF, but not PostScript. Maybe; I seem to recall PDF was pushed to ISO-standardization, but might be= misremembering. > I would probably choose HTML5 for portability.=20 Well, that's basically Gnoga's approach. I was thinking more of going the o= ther way: using this for a system's base itself. (Possibly being able to sh= are things with other Ada projects; e.g. the Wasabee web-browser.)