From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,c406e0c4a6eb74ed X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews2.google.com!not-for-mail From: fmdf@tiscali.it (fabio de francesco) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: ADA Popularity Discussion Request Date: 22 Aug 2004 00:16:53 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: References: <49dc98cf.0408110556.18ae7df@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 80.183.74.82 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1093159013 21124 127.0.0.1 (22 Aug 2004 07:16:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2004 07:16:53 +0000 (UTC) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2920 Date: 2004-08-22T00:16:53-07:00 List-Id: fmdf@tiscali.it (fabio de francesco) wrote in message news:... > In some way, the > refuse of Ada recalls to me the same ridiculus position took by some C > programmer towards C++. Sorry for my poor English, please read: In some way, the refusal of Ada recalls me the same ridiculous position taken up by some C programmer against the adoption of C++. Regards, Fabio De Francesco