From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5-pre1 (2020-06-20) on
	ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_20,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5-pre1
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:e148:: with SMTP id c8mr24766187qvl.18.1617646766796; Mon, 05 Apr 2021 11:19:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:f40f:: with SMTP id q15mr38557558ybd.73.1617646766570; Mon, 05 Apr 2021 11:19:26 -0700 (PDT)
Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder1.feed.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!tr3.eu1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2021 11:19:26 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <s4430n$q07$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=146.5.2.231; posting-account=lJ3JNwoAAAAQfH3VV9vttJLkThaxtTfC
NNTP-Posting-Host: 146.5.2.231
References: <s3t21q$q55$1@dont-email.me> <298c004a-4d9d-4499-b0af-2eec41c5b516n@googlegroups.com> <s4430n$q07$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <ba3a72c8-c61c-4dc8-bab0-4eb785b05428n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Are there any cross-compiler for Embedded Linux on ARMv7?
From: Shark8 <onewingedshark@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2021 18:19:26 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:61736
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Thursday, April 1, 2021 at 3:16:09 AM UTC-6, John McCabe wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Mar 2021 10:58:53 -0700, Shark8 wrote:=20
>=20
> > On Monday, March 29, 2021 at 11:16:46 AM UTC-6, John McCabe wrote:=20
> >>=20
> >> If anyone knows more about this, any info they can give me would be=20
> >> very much appreciated; at this point I'm particularly interested in AR=
M=20
> >> A9 support, and at least Ada 2005, preferably 2012.=20
> > Hm?=20
> > Looking at doing Jazelle/native-Java-bytecode?
> Hadn't thought of it - can you tell me why you might think that?
IIRC the ARM-9 was Jazelle that did the most "Java bytecode as native instr=
uctions", and there was a GNAT-JVM (IIRC GNAT Community release circa 2014)=
 that targeted the JVM, which was Ada 2005 and [slightly buggy, iIRC] Ada 2=
012 =E2=80=94 hence it could be possible to run JVM-targeted Ada 2005/2012 =
natively on such a processor.