From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 2002:a24:1a57:: with SMTP id 84-v6mr2321261iti.36.1525001596650; Sun, 29 Apr 2018 04:33:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a9d:703:: with SMTP id 3-v6mr673672ote.11.1525001596438; Sun, 29 Apr 2018 04:33:16 -0700 (PDT) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.uzoreto.com!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder-in1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!k65-v6no1513495ita.0!news-out.google.com!b185-v6ni2368itb.0!nntp.google.com!k65-v6no1513494ita.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2018 04:33:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=135.23.130.51; posting-account=cUi90woAAADTaOISowbbHM8GUD0-opJO NNTP-Posting-Host: 135.23.130.51 References: <1c73f159-eae4-4ae7-a348-03964b007197@googlegroups.com> <87k1su7nag.fsf@nightsong.com> <87po2la2qt.fsf@nightsong.com> <87in8buttb.fsf@jacob-sparre.dk> <3f7a7f76-c5eb-4cba-9051-6b5dfeeb906c@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: How to get Ada to ?cross the chasm?? From: patrick@spellingbeewinnars.org Injection-Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2018 11:33:16 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Received-Bytes: 2350 X-Received-Body-CRC: 161484340 Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:51785 Date: 2018-04-29T04:33:16-07:00 List-Id: That's fair but that's not the only issue. If no one appears to be maintain= ing the software then it becomes less attractive. Issues can come up later = and with no one to apply a bug fix, it could be a real problem.=20 And that's just the technical aspect, poor presentation is a problem even i= f there are no technical issues. Software that has not been updated for 10 = years just isn't going to be as appealing as software that was updated a ye= ar ago. I am not a fan of Ruby on Rails but David Heinemeier Hansson did a good job= of promoting it and getting people excited about it. I don't think there i= s anything similar here and that's sad because I bet there is very good sof= tware being overlooked due to non-technical issues.