From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 2002:a5e:9208:: with SMTP id y8-v6mr2059768iop.70.1532169218871; Sat, 21 Jul 2018 03:33:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:aca:75c9:: with SMTP id q192-v6mr74569oic.3.1532169218737; Sat, 21 Jul 2018 03:33:38 -0700 (PDT) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.linkpendium.com!news.linkpendium.com!news.snarked.org!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!g2-v6no2503368itf.0!news-out.google.com!k71-v6ni4096itk.0!nntp.google.com!d7-v6no2543277itj.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2018 03:33:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2003:c7:83f8:ebfa:d14f:e5a3:8b8:8999; posting-account=rmHyLAoAAADSQmMWJF0a_815Fdd96RDf NNTP-Posting-Host: 2003:c7:83f8:ebfa:d14f:e5a3:8b8:8999 References: <40d568da-4715-42de-8e28-98da39a5c974@googlegroups.com> <34f499f7-020f-4dcc-adad-0ab1113386d1@googlegroups.com> <9d69e7b5-6b2d-4607-9f7b-affa78c41620@googlegroups.com> <41c711cb-0300-4a41-93d3-e69297ae1945@googlegroups.com> <42de4aa3-9e7c-44b8-aa84-712cc7ce03c6@googlegroups.com> <9b6b6f10-5956-4a19-83f5-c1c015c62602@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Visibility of Indexing aspects From: AdaMagica Injection-Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2018 10:33:38 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:53933 Date: 2018-07-21T03:33:38-07:00 List-Id: Am Samstag, 21. Juli 2018 00:07:01 UTC+2 schrieb Jere: > > BTW: You should definitely report this severe bug to AdaCore. > I'll see if I can figure out a way to word this. As you can > see, I am not super competent in the RM, so I'm not sure I=20 > will be able to prove to them it is one. I'm not a paying > customer (would like to be, but they are out of my price range), > so I normally don't send them bug reports unless I really can > show a verified bug. No need of proof that this is a bug. I sent in many reports, most of them i= ndeed were bugs, a few not. I learned to read the RM in this way. (I was a = supported user then, so AdaCore promptly answered any report with interesti= ng discussions - and I remember extremely rare events when I was right and = they were wrong - mostly it was the other way round and I learned to read t= he RM word by word. But I don't claim to be a language lawyer, I never did.= ) If you want to substantiate your report, just add the RM references appeari= ng in this discussion. But I think just the ovservation that something hidd= en in the private part is useable from outside should be sufficient to indi= cate that there is a severe bug in the implementation (of the RM, i.e. the = compiler GNAT). And there is still the old Dewar rule: The RM does not say nonsense. If it = seems so, the interpretation is wrong.