From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 2002:aed:33c5:: with SMTP id v63mr6769525qtd.298.1579254854669;
 Fri, 17 Jan 2020 01:54:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6304:: with SMTP id q4mr5370736otk.332.1579254854529;
 Fri, 17 Jan 2020 01:54:14 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!feeder1.feed.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr3.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!g89no5685029qtd.0!news-out.google.com!w29ni1499qtc.0!nntp.google.com!g89no5685024qtd.0!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 01:54:14 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <qumug8$1bsj$1@gioia.aioe.org>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=95.34.36.27;
 posting-account=bPTmZAoAAAC_6HP9XLKB9aAAxBa6BuOR
NNTP-Posting-Host: 95.34.36.27
References: <c50bce0f-f69a-4182-9813-a4909f7dbcd6@googlegroups.com>
 <1d96e0e1-7700-4947-9fcb-051a1203c703@googlegroups.com>
 <h6uum4F2481U1@mid.individual.net> <que0g1$5rn$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
 <d770cfc3-0d99-4b4f-af61-22e9ec849ba7@googlegroups.com>
 <qugfrp$b0t$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk> <qukden$1k8o$2@gioia.aioe.org>
 <8bc80421-29fb-4f19-baf0-b14680a99c32@googlegroups.com>
 <qumug8$1bsj$1@gioia.aioe.org>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <c02eb3b5-68e7-431e-bc3c-74dc278409ed@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Is this a bug?
From: reinert <reinkor@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 09:54:14 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:57859
Date: 2020-01-17T01:54:14-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

fredag 3. januar 2020 09.37.32 UTC+1 skrev Dmitry A. Kazakov f=C3=B8lgende:
.....
>=20
> Yes, but that is was not possible, because in Ada 95 the function "a"=20
> did not conflict with members. The change in Ada 2005 introduced dot=20
> notation and thus the conflict.
>=20

Still I struggle to understand this. Why could it not be possible to tell t=
he compiler that "this is Ada strict and do not - for god's sake - accept s=
uch possible ambiguities" ?

reinert