From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5-pre1 (2020-06-20) on
	ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5-pre1
X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:2ec:: with SMTP id a12mr14635806qko.92.1622446924537;
        Mon, 31 May 2021 00:42:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:6d02:: with SMTP id i2mr29592190ybc.309.1622446924345;
 Mon, 31 May 2021 00:42:04 -0700 (PDT)
Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.mixmin.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 00:42:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <s90s5l$b3d$1@dont-email.me>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=94.31.98.170; posting-account=rmHyLAoAAADSQmMWJF0a_815Fdd96RDf
NNTP-Posting-Host: 94.31.98.170
References: <f6b41bac-39d2-441d-a89d-3485bf3fa99bn@googlegroups.com> <s90s5l$b3d$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <c5a4504a-d3dd-4809-97de-a08f01af2b08n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Suggestion about best practice with .gpr files
From: AdaMagica <christ-usch.grein@t-online.de>
Injection-Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 07:42:04 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:62056
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Jeffrey R. Carter schrieb am Sonntag, 30. Mai 2021 um 22:22:16 UTC+2:
> The best practice is not to use project files.
That's a bit extreme. I remember that APEX and ObjAda both had their own ways to define their library structures for source and object files. And so has GNAT.
I don't think that there is a universal way.
> When everything is is Ada, they 
> only add unnecessary and non-portable complexity. Unnecessary complexity is a 
> sign of incompetence. 
> 
> The same is true of build directory structures.