From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5-pre1 (2020-06-20) on ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5-pre1 X-Received: by 2002:ac8:698f:: with SMTP id o15mr6189487qtq.39.1615151395325; Sun, 07 Mar 2021 13:09:55 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a25:9303:: with SMTP id f3mr30299666ybo.165.1615151395167; Sun, 07 Mar 2021 13:09:55 -0800 (PST) Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2021 13:09:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2804:14c:4c1:b99c:4ad0:9a96:833:c895; posting-account=wgmHdgoAAAA-F7JItPEZjeXqFc0KdzEQ NNTP-Posting-Host: 2804:14c:4c1:b99c:4ad0:9a96:833:c895 References: <53c7e210-03cd-46b2-8cc7-ac963292dd1dn@googlegroups.com> <2e10ee22-3327-4c31-9527-fdf115e4efdan@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Pool and SubPools can be used for remote access ? From: Daniel Norte Moraes Injection-Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2021 21:09:55 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:61497 List-Id: Em domingo, 7 de mar=C3=A7o de 2021 =C3=A0s 05:30:38 UTC-3, Dmitry A. Kazak= ov escreveu: > On 2021-03-07 02:26, Daniel Norte Moraes wrote:=20 > > Em s=C3=A1bado, 6 de mar=C3=A7o de 2021 =C3=A0s 17:22:34 UTC-3, Dmitry = A. Kazakov escreveu:=20 > >> On 2021-03-06 20:48, Daniel Norte Moraes wrote:=20 > >>=20 > >>> I'm learning mpi and openMP and take this insite:=20 > >>> ? Is possible to use remote data ( e.g. shared memory , variables etc= [=20 > >>> via network and other protocols]) by implementing=20 > >>> an custom storage_pool's ? the array in storage pool need be continuo= us or=20 > >>> an 'fake-length' array is ok ? someone already tried it yet ?=20 > >> Storage pool can be backed by whatever mechanism. The layout of object= s=20 > >> allocated in the pool depends on the object. The strategy could be=20 > >> mirroring remote objects or using proxy object instead.=20 > >>=20 > >> As for implementations there exist distributed annex implementations= =20 > >> which must support remote objects.=20 > >=20 > > Beyond polyorb, there other implentations ? can you cite some ? > Not that I am aware of. The distributed annex is defined in a way that=20 > any network protocol could be used if it has RPC or if you could put an= =20 > RPC layer on top of it, even HTTP POST (:-)) > >> There exist persistent storage implementations. Persistent objects=20 > >> resemble remote objects in many aspects.=20 > >>=20 > > can cite some? > http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de/ada/components.htm#2 > >> There exist interprocess shared storage pools implementation.=20 > >>=20 > > can cite some ? > http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de/ada/components.htm#12.8 > --=20 > Regards,=20 > Dmitry A. Kazakov=20 > http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de A ReallyThanks! ^^ Best Wishes, Dani.