From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!news2.glorb.com!wn11feed!worldnet.att.net!bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada From: anon@anon.org (anon) Subject: Re: unsigned type Reply-To: anon@anon.org (anon) References: <36be81a3-2a1b-442e-a404-13ad2c94cb7c@z9g2000yqi.googlegroups.com> X-Newsreader: IBM NewsReader/2 2.0 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 20:06:32 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.65.6.97 X-Complaints-To: abuse@worldnet.att.net X-Trace: bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net 1246305992 12.65.6.97 (Mon, 29 Jun 2009 20:06:32 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 20:06:32 GMT Organization: AT&T Worldnet Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:6729 Date: 2009-06-29T20:06:32+00:00 List-Id: TOTALLY WRONG!!! If you check the writing style of "anon@anon.org (anon)" you will see that there is one and only one person that uses that name and post at the movement from ATT.NET. Of course, if a few weeks that will change. The other person who spelled out "Anonymous" just copyed the email address that I use. If you look I did answer his question, but I assume that person installed the correct version aka the 64-bit version. And under Linux I prefer "Kate" instead of the GPS ide, faster and fexible for my needs. In <36be81a3-2a1b-442e-a404-13ad2c94cb7c@z9g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>, sjw writes: >On Jun 29, 11:21=A0am, Ludovic Brenta >wrote: >> Jean-Pierre Rosen wrote on comp.lang.ada: >> >> > I usually refrain from responding to "anon", but this is so wrong that = >I >> > have to... (Note: in French, "anon" is a young donkey; maybe that's >> > where he got his name from...) >> >> That would explain his stubbornness at using defending top-posting, >> too :) > >There is more than one anon@anon.org: recently someone whose alias was >"Anonymous" asked a sensible newbie question, and one of the responses >(not totally daft this time) was from "anon". Google news showed both >email addresses as anon@anon.org ...