From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.66.65.142 with SMTP id x14mr17932158pas.14.1404834058169; Tue, 08 Jul 2014 08:40:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.50.98.8 with SMTP id ee8mr102556igb.12.1404834057908; Tue, 08 Jul 2014 08:40:57 -0700 (PDT) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!peer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!hn18no325429igb.0!news-out.google.com!gf2ni1igb.0!nntp.google.com!hn18no325427igb.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2014 08:40:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <57a862ed-e49e-4bea-b0de-5ffbfc7ecf99@googlegroups.com> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=66.126.103.122; posting-account=KSa2aQoAAACOxnC0usBJYX8NE3x3a1Xq NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.126.103.122 References: <0e0b9ac2-e793-4cc5-8d8d-d3441ca28a58@googlegroups.com> <1j7b0m3yptffy$.1cztnkty8elrv$.dlg@40tude.net> <57a862ed-e49e-4bea-b0de-5ffbfc7ecf99@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Forcing GNAT to use 32-bit load/store instructions on ARM? From: Adam Beneschan Injection-Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2014 15:40:57 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Received-Bytes: 2035 X-Received-Body-CRC: 1664858811 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:20805 Date: 2014-07-08T08:40:57-07:00 List-Id: On Tuesday, July 8, 2014 8:36:03 AM UTC-7, Adam Beneschan wrote: > On Tuesday, July 8, 2014 5:12:22 AM UTC-7, Simon Clubley wrote: > > What are the submission details for Ada-Comment ? > http://www.ada-auth.org/standards/12aarm/html/AA-0-2.html, paragraph 58ff. Actually, http://www.ada-auth.org/standards/12rm/html/RM-0-2.html is slightly better. (I tend to consult the AARM first always, so that's why I came up with that link.) -- Adam