From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,c406e0c4a6eb74ed X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!proxad.net!newsfeed.stueberl.de!news-mue1.dfn.de!news-ham1.dfn.de!news.uni-hamburg.de!cs.tu-berlin.de!uni-duisburg.de!not-for-mail From: Georg Bauhaus Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: ADA Popularity Discussion Request Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 11:53:26 +0000 (UTC) Organization: GMUGHDU Message-ID: References: <49dc98cf.0408110556.18ae7df@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: l1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de X-Trace: a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de 1093607606 29428 134.91.1.34 (27 Aug 2004 11:53:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.uni-duisburg.de NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 11:53:26 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: tin/1.5.8-20010221 ("Blue Water") (UNIX) (HP-UX/B.11.00 (9000/800)) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3083 Date: 2004-08-27T11:53:26+00:00 List-Id: Kevin Cline wrote: : OTOH, there is no way in Ada to produce the equivalent of : sophisticated C++ libraries like the Boost spirit parser. There might be no way to produce the exact equivalent of C++ template computing based libraries using Ada generics. There certainly are ways to produce sophisticated libraries in Ada. For the spirit parser, see my other post about the SPITBOL library. : But Ada has been almost universally ignored by the Computer Science : research community. Could you give some examples? -- Georg