From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,aee8ed05a978aff9 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!news.zanker.org!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!news.uni-stuttgart.de!carbon.eu.sun.com!btnet-feed5!btnet!news.btopenworld.com!not-for-mail From: "Martin Dowie" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Is this definition legal? Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 11:53:32 +0000 (UTC) Organization: BT Openworld Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: host81-152-56-142.range81-152.btcentralplus.com X-Trace: sparta.btinternet.com 1095594812 13614 81.152.56.142 (19 Sep 2004 11:53:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news-complaints@lists.btinternet.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 11:53:32 +0000 (UTC) X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3843 Date: 2004-09-19T11:53:32+00:00 List-Id: Bj�rn Persson wrote: > GCC-Gnat 3.4.0 is having serious problems with the definition of > Character_Encoding below: Compiles fine on ObjectAda 7.2.2 (U14).