From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,243dc2fb696a49cd
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!oleane.net!oleane!ciril.fr!news.cs.univ-paris8.fr!news.zanker.org!nntp.idg.pl!newsfeed.atman.pl!newsfeed.tpinternet.pl!atlantis.news.tpi.pl!news.tpi.pl!not-for-mail
From: "Robert Kawulak" <tigrisek@interia.pl>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada Popularity: Comparison of Ada/Charles with C++ STL (and Perl)
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 19:21:04 +0200
Organization: tp.internet - http://www.tpi.pl/
Message-ID: <cjcn5t$s37$1@atlantis.news.tpi.pl>
References: <e749549b.0409211621.6f3d3723@posting.google.com>
 <g563l0llm9trvjcn9n9ao4vit704b43kqm@4ax.com>
 <e749549b.0409230100.6a488b25@posting.google.com> <wvbrd60dusx0.fsf@sun.com>
 <e749549b.0409231111.7d98264d@posting.google.com>
 <cj0qlt$qkh$1@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de>
 <e749549b.0409240828.53001e66@posting.google.com>
 <41547dae$0$91007$39cecf19@news.twtelecom.net>
 <e749549b.0409252313.7cf8ca3a@posting.google.com>
 <uekkpt07s.fsf@earthlink.net>
 <e749549b.0409270631.2bf81ccf@posting.google.com>
 <1g2d9xmnita9f.5ecju0eftkqw$.dlg@40tude.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pk133.krakow.cvx.ppp.tpnet.pl
X-Trace: atlantis.news.tpi.pl 1096409085 28775 217.99.211.133 (28 Sep 2004
 22:04:45 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@tpi.pl
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 22:04:45 +0000 (UTC)
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:4342
Date: 2004-09-28T19:21:04+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Hi,

> Note that C++ does not solve the
> problem, because it has no arrays.

What exactly do you mean by that? I suppose it's some kind of metaphore...

Of course C++ has got arrays inherited from C which are the core language 
construct, and std::vector<> which is safe and dynamic-sized version of an 
array.

> So it allows you to define [] and leaves
> you alone with that. It is not the Ada's way (TM).

Again I don't see your point here... As to the C++(R) std::vector<>, there 
is operator [] defined.

Best regards,
Robert