From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,1e08410099d337f8 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!xmission!news.utah.edu!newsfeed.cs.utexas.edu!geraldo.cc.utexas.edu!not-for-mail From: bdbryant@mail.utexas.edu (Bobby D. Bryant) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: creating own Image function Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 17:06:25 +0000 (UTC) Organization: dis- Message-ID: References: <1104339103.436794.134250@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> Reply-To: bdbryant@mail.utexas.edu NNTP-Posting-Host: dial-b-128-83-204-219.telesys.its.utexas.edu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: geraldo.cc.utexas.edu 1104339985 21980 128.83.204.219 (29 Dec 2004 17:06:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@utexas.edu NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 17:06:25 +0000 (UTC) X-Newsreader: knews 1.0b.1 Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:7300 Date: 2004-12-29T17:06:25+00:00 List-Id: On Wed, 29 Dec 2004, "R" wrote: > Hello. > > I've written my own Image function it's sth like Java's toString. > > function Image(this: rec1) return String is > tmp : String(1..26); > begin > tmp := "The value of field is:" & Integer'Image(Get(this)); > return tmp; > end Image; > > when I use it: > > testclass.Create(object, 100); -- note 100 is 3 digits = 3 Characters > Put(testclass.Image(object)); > > then I can see "The value of field is: 100" > when I initiate my object with 10 - 2 digits = 2 Characters > an exception is raised: > CONSTRAINT_ERROR : testclass.adb:34 length check failed > > it's because tmp: Sting has it's fixed length can it be more flexible? > > When I tried with String(1..100) the same effect > users can initate their objects with 1, 11, 111, 111111 and so on. > > so my question is: can I write(with Your help of course) a function > flexible to handle all those situations? I think you can declare tmp as - tmp : String := "The value of field is:" & Integer'Image(Get(this)); For that matter, I think you can skip the declaration and just do - return "The value of field is:" & Integer'Image(Get(this)); as the body of your function. -- Bobby Bryant Austin, Texas