From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,776a7f0c329d226e
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!proxad.net!newsfeed.stueberl.de!news-mue1.dfn.de!news-ham1.dfn.de!news.uni-hamburg.de!cs.tu-berlin.de!uni-duisburg.de!not-for-mail
From: Georg Bauhaus <sb463ba@l1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Isnt Gnat irrelevant ? ( was Re: Will the
 World	ever	seesomethingbeyond GNAT 3.15p?)
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 11:48:00 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: GMUGHDU
Message-ID: <csavtg$k34$1@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de>
References: <mailman.44.1105496732.527.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
   <87wtuhi6qk.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> <x7vllaxj8xp.fsf@smaug.pushface.org>
 <cs74f7$an5$1@titan.btinternet.com>
 <mailman.50.1105703340.527.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
 <87u0pjq4cm.fsf@insalien.org>
 <mailman.53.1105730735.527.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
 <87mzvbpr56.fsf@insalien.org>
 <mailman.56.1105744000.527.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
 <pan.2005.01.15.00.22.12.789794@hotmail.com>
 <mailman.59.1105785061.527.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: l1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de
X-Trace: a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de 1105789680 20580 134.91.1.34 (15 Jan 2005
 11:48:00 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.uni-duisburg.de
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 11:48:00 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: tin/1.5.8-20010221 ("Blue Water") (UNIX) (HP-UX/B.11.00
 (9000/800))
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:7801
Date: 2005-01-15T11:48:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Marius Amado Alves <amado.alves@netcabo.pt> wrote:
: Nobody knows.
(= 1)

: This is a legal conundrum
(= 2)

:... IANAL
(= 3)

: My additional point was that all open 
: source is in similar chaos.

I read this statement in the light of the difficulties of drawing a
consistent conclusion from 1, 2, and 3.

What you say is in insane chaos seems to work pretty well for companies with
big legal departments like IBM. But maybe IBM is in chaos?

Compensation, if applicable, has not not been defined here, but discussed.
Has anyone seen a GAP contract?


-- Georg