From: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Is the "Ada mandate" being reconsidered?
Date: 1996/06/09
Date: 1996-06-09T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dewar.834341377@schonberg> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 4peu0v$rfq@news15.erols.com
Mike, the policy that Ada must be used for DoD development has not changed.
It is of course under constant review to make sure that it is applied
appropriately, but there is no change in policy that would affect your
project at the current time. The understanding that there has been such
a change is just plain wrong.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1996-06-09 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 85+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1996-05-08 0:00 Is the "Ada mandate" being reconsidered? Howard Dodson
1996-05-08 0:00 ` Thomas C. Timberlake
1996-05-08 0:00 ` David Weller
1996-05-08 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
[not found] ` <31913863.446B9B3D@escmail.orl.mmc.com>
1996-05-10 0:00 ` Robert Munck
1996-05-13 0:00 ` Theodore E. Dennison
1996-05-13 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
1996-05-14 0:00 ` Robert Munck
1996-05-14 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1996-05-17 0:00 ` Robert Munck
1996-06-03 0:00 ` Roy M. Bell
1996-06-09 0:00 ` Peggy Byers
1996-06-09 0:00 ` David Weller
1996-06-09 0:00 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
1996-06-10 0:00 ` Paul Whittington
1996-06-10 0:00 ` James Krell
1996-06-11 0:00 ` Michael Levasseur
1996-06-12 0:00 ` Theodore E. Dennison
1996-06-13 0:00 ` Michael Levasseur
1996-06-14 0:00 ` Theodore E. Dennison
1996-06-15 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-06-17 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
1996-06-20 0:00 ` Joe Gwinn
1996-06-25 0:00 ` Bob Kitzberger
1996-06-12 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
1996-06-10 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1996-06-10 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
1996-06-11 0:00 ` Jim Kingdon
1996-06-11 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
1996-06-12 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
1996-06-12 0:00 ` Tom Robinson
1996-06-12 0:00 ` Fergus Henderson
1996-06-13 0:00 ` Tom Robinson
1996-06-13 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-06-13 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-06-18 0:00 ` Theodore E. Dennison
1996-06-18 0:00 ` Theodore E. Dennison
1996-06-24 0:00 ` Carl Bowman
1996-06-13 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
1996-06-13 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-06-13 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1996-06-14 0:00 ` Tom Robinson
[not found] ` <31DD5234.11CB@thomsoft.com>
1996-07-18 0:00 ` Front Ends (was: Re: Is the "Ada mandate" being reconsidered?) Tom Robinson
1996-06-13 0:00 ` Is the "Ada mandate" being reconsidered? Jon S Anthony
1996-06-14 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
1996-06-14 0:00 ` Jim Kingdon
1996-06-21 0:00 ` Richard Riehle
1996-06-22 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-06-14 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
1996-07-19 0:00 ` Front Ends (was: Re: Is the "Ada mandate" being reconsidered?) Jon S Anthony
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1996-06-14 0:00 Is the "Ada mandate" being reconsidered? Mark Bell
1996-06-14 0:00 Mark Bell
1996-06-14 0:00 ` Kevin J. Weise
1996-06-17 0:00 ` Theodore E. Dennison
1996-06-18 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-06-24 0:00 ` Michael Levasseur
1996-06-17 0:00 Marin David Condic, 407.796.8997, M/S 731-93
1996-06-19 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
1996-06-19 0:00 ` Jim Kingdon
1996-06-21 0:00 Bob Crispen
1996-06-25 0:00 ` Joe Gwinn
1996-06-25 0:00 ` Michael Feldman
1996-06-27 0:00 ` Joe Gwinn
1996-06-29 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-07-01 0:00 ` Norman H. Cohen
1996-06-27 0:00 ` Bob Crispen
1996-06-27 0:00 ` Jim Kingdon
1996-06-28 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
1996-06-30 0:00 ` Nasser Abbasi
1996-07-03 0:00 ` Joe Gwinn
1996-07-08 0:00 ` Bob Kitzberger
1996-07-10 0:00 ` Joe Gwinn
1996-07-10 0:00 ` David Emery
1996-07-11 0:00 ` Michael Feldman
1996-07-15 0:00 ` Brad Balfour
1996-07-11 0:00 ` James Rhodes
1996-07-11 0:00 ` Jim Chelini
1996-07-22 0:00 ` Joe Gwinn
1996-07-12 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
1996-07-08 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
1996-06-30 0:00 ` Ronald Cole
1996-06-30 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1996-06-30 0:00 ` Richard Kenner
1996-07-12 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
[not found] <nhd91w250f.fsf@paralysys>
1996-07-16 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox