From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,3ccb707f4c91a5f2
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Java vs Ada 95 (Was Re: Once again,
 Ada absent from DoD SBIR solicitation)
Date: 1996/10/17
Message-ID: <dewar.845558614@merv>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 190113127
references: <325BC3B3.41C6@hso.link.com>
 <Dz2B9H.9HD.0.-s@inmet.camb.inmet.com>
 	<ROGOFF.96Oct10095045@sccm.Stanford.EDU> <JSA.96Oct11152938@alexandria>
 	<ROGOFF.96Oct15102253@sccm.Stanford.EDU> <JSA.96Oct16180650@alexandria>
organization: New York University
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-10-17T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


For those supporting the idea of an Annex requiring garbage collection, by
far the most constructive action, far more useful than posting messages
to CLA, would be to draft such an annex. If you can get something which
people agree on as making technical sense, then the next step would be to
get some implementors to implement it, and perhaps to add it to ACE.