From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
	ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_40,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Received: by 2002:a37:9504:: with SMTP id x4mr20599251qkd.235.1626636293273;
        Sun, 18 Jul 2021 12:24:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:6b0c:: with SMTP id g12mr27656945ybc.303.1626636292999;
 Sun, 18 Jul 2021 12:24:52 -0700 (PDT)
Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.mixmin.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2021 12:24:52 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <ly7dhny4ig.fsf@pushface.org>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=109.180.159.156; posting-account=8KbgxQkAAACJyvtPg84oL23eOX_jDVUP
NNTP-Posting-Host: 109.180.159.156
References: <4e943274-59ad-497d-9ef1-5f5d096aea56n@googlegroups.com>
 <lyfswcy6zx.fsf@pushface.org> <6b724d0f-3184-47f0-8266-c805406cf4b7n@googlegroups.com>
 <sd0qjl$hj2$1@gioia.aioe.org> <76673bec-53cc-4789-8f01-4a1d0d04e077n@googlegroups.com>
 <71c3d589-fd6f-4b5e-a9f3-394109b1fa05n@googlegroups.com> <ly7dhny4ig.fsf@pushface.org>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <e31c513b-3836-4baa-9017-f940ce500231n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Problem with emacs ada-mode-7.1.4
From: Paul Onions <ponions37@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2021 19:24:53 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:62409
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Sunday, 18 July 2021 at 17:24:11 UTC+1, Simon Wright wrote:
> There was an interesting thread about this at [1]; I'm 
> not sure from that whether the ada-mode code is OK or not, but it seems 
> that even if it is we'll have to wait for a later compiler release. 

Thanks for looking further into it.  Not sure I'm qualified enough in the Ada world to properly follow the discussion in the thread you link to -- I'll try to spend some on it later :-)

Thanks,
Paul