From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
	ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_50,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:46d0:: with SMTP id h16mr5127405qto.362.1625819041546;
        Fri, 09 Jul 2021 01:24:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:dc50:: with SMTP id y77mr45499316ybe.405.1625819041322;
 Fri, 09 Jul 2021 01:24:01 -0700 (PDT)
Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.szaf.org!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2021 01:24:01 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87mtqvucud.fsf@nightsong.com>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=89.8.153.148; posting-account=uulyKwoAAAA86DO0ODu--rZtbje8Sytn
NNTP-Posting-Host: 89.8.153.148
References: <cd296b88-2e0a-403f-82c7-973e41fa7331n@googlegroups.com>
 <sc4fuo$8vn$1@gioia.aioe.org> <e9hbeg9014he87s6kbrkinrt4tre1cfgqc@4ax.com>
 <ly8s2iorpl.fsf@pushface.org> <5a1cegtfm5ibqej3ldebpc4g99ujniqt9u@4ax.com>
 <a0080e82-2f52-4fd7-9c44-6bc2d8f0664bn@googlegroups.com> <sc6cgh$9vu$1@dont-email.me>
 <sc6kqh$1sj$1@dont-email.me> <sc6lba$1vma$1@gioia.aioe.org>
 <sc6mit$ddv$1@dont-email.me> <sc7d65$1kcq$1@gioia.aioe.org> <87mtqvucud.fsf@nightsong.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <e350c5dc-90f2-4354-b33a-90edad858169n@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Not good for Ada endorsement
From: Egil H H <ehh.public@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2021 08:24:01 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:62363
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Friday, July 9, 2021 at 10:10:37 AM UTC+2, Paul Rubin wrote:
> "Luke A. Guest" <> writes: 
> > It's as straight a conversion from the C++ to Ada. I intend to keep 
> > optimising it.
> I'd be interested in seeing a straight conversion of Pascal to Ada, if 
> the existing Ada code differs significantly from the existing Pascal 
> code in a way that affects the speed and isn't a straightforward 
> conversion.

One significant difference between the original Ada version and the Pascal and C++ versions, is
that Ada is missing a Num := Factor before the first inner loop. 
(Luke fixed that in his version, though)