From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,c406e0c4a6eb74ed X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews2.google.com!not-for-mail From: kevin.cline@gmail.com (Kevin Cline) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: ADA Popularity Discussion Request Date: 27 Aug 2004 14:48:54 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: References: <49dc98cf.0408110556.18ae7df@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 170.215.184.159 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1093643335 19322 127.0.0.1 (27 Aug 2004 21:48:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 21:48:55 +0000 (UTC) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3102 Date: 2004-08-27T14:48:54-07:00 List-Id: Georg Bauhaus wrote in message news:... > Kevin Cline wrote: > : OTOH, there is no way in Ada to produce the equivalent of > : sophisticated C++ libraries like the Boost spirit parser. > > There might be no way to produce the exact equivalent of C++ template > computing based libraries using Ada generics. > There certainly are ways to produce sophisticated libraries in Ada. > For the spirit parser, see my other post about the SPITBOL library. > > : But Ada has been almost universally ignored by the Computer Science > : research community. > > Could you give some examples? An example of what? Of computer scientists who do not program in or teach Ada? Are there any CS programs that have chosen Ada as their core language? I rarely meet recent graduates with any exposure to Ada at all. For better or worse, (worse in my opinion), most CS departments seem to have settled on Java.