From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,c406e0c4a6eb74ed X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews2.google.com!not-for-mail From: kevin.cline@gmail.com (Kevin Cline) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: ADA Popularity Discussion Request Date: 14 Sep 2004 10:29:09 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: References: <49dc98cf.0408110556.18ae7df@posting.google.com> <413e2fbd$0$30586$626a14ce@news.free.fr> <1371289.WCcgO7lass@linux1.krischik.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 198.23.26.253 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1095182949 12428 127.0.0.1 (14 Sep 2004 17:29:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 17:29:09 +0000 (UTC) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3731 Date: 2004-09-14T10:29:09-07:00 List-Id: Georg Bauhaus wrote in message news:... > Kevin Cline wrote: > : I expect that most of Ada's features could be implemented as C++ > : library code. > > Are you saying that one should compare the benefits of ISO > standardised languages and feature semantics by referring to which > features could be implemented in libraries? What if the Ada fans > start talking about what is possible with ASIS (which might render > C++ template computing a poor thing)? They should do that. It might make Ada more popular. I found what appears to be the ASIS home page at http://www. gnat.com/addons_asis.php. It mentions using ASIS to support run-time type reflection, but says nothing about using ASIS for generative programming. That seems like a stretch for ASIS, it is basically a hookable Ada parser, but to get better support for generative programming you'll need to extend the language somehow.