From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,243dc2fb696a49cd
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: kevin.cline@gmail.com (Kevin Cline)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada Popularity: Comparison of Ada/Charles with C++ STL (and Perl)
Date: 23 Sep 2004 02:20:22 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <e749549b.0409230120.7865c662@posting.google.com>
References: <e749549b.0409211621.6f3d3723@posting.google.com>
 <cisper$e5u$1@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.219.97.214
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1095931222 28369 127.0.0.1 (23 Sep 2004 09:20:22
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 09:20:22 +0000 (UTC)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3998
Date: 2004-09-23T02:20:22-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Georg Bauhaus <sb463ba@l1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de> wrote in message news:<cisper$e5u$1@a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de>...
> Kevin Cline <kevin.cline@gmail.com> wrote:
> : 
> : Summary:
> : 
> : Ada/Charles 158 lines, 9 files
> 
> If you want, you can place all units in one file. The compilers
> can handle this.

I was pretty sure that all those instantiations could go into the
body.

> Will the compilation process profit from splitting
> C++ sources into files, in general?

No, it will get slower, in general, because opening files is about the
slowest part of compilation.  The only reason to split code into
multiple files is to ease maintenance.