From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,243dc2fb696a49cd X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: kevin.cline@gmail.com (Kevin Cline) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada Popularity: Comparison of Ada/Charles with C++ STL (and Perl) Date: 24 Sep 2004 13:21:03 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 198.23.5.11 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1096057263 18129 127.0.0.1 (24 Sep 2004 20:21:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 20:21:03 +0000 (UTC) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:4134 Date: 2004-09-24T13:21:03-07:00 List-Id: Matthew Heaney wrote in message news:... > "Randy Brukardt" writes: > > > Why were all of the files needed? For a program of this size, I would > > have nested the specifications in the body. (One possible reason was > > the old restriction on nesting of tagged type extensions. Ada 2005 has > > eliminated this restriction, so that particular issue will go away > > soon.) > > Yes, the map instantiation was done at library level. > > However, Kevin's file count appears to include all of the files in the > closure of the program, which means he's counting all the stuff in > ada.containers.*. This isn't really fair, since he didn't count all the > myriad files in the STL. I only counted the files in examples/wordcount_vector. The first version I saw had a main body and eight specification files. The current version has a main body and two specification files.