From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:32ec:: with SMTP id
 a41mr21655774qtb.235.1575815516543;
        Sun, 08 Dec 2019 06:31:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:58c9:: with SMTP id s9mr17838723oth.182.1575815516278;
 Sun, 08 Dec 2019 06:31:56 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.gegeweb.eu!gegeweb.org!usenet-fr.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!209.85.160.216.MISMATCH!g89no6254811qtd.0!news-out.google.com!w29ni557qtc.0!nntp.google.com!g89no6254806qtd.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2019 06:31:56 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <qsioca$nf2$1@dont-email.me>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=146.5.17.67;
 posting-account=lJ3JNwoAAAAQfH3VV9vttJLkThaxtTfC
NNTP-Posting-Host: 146.5.17.67
References: <qs8du6$sg4$1@dont-email.me>
 <f0d2cb32-33fd-4420-bf93-62bf0c005ba0@googlegroups.com>
 <qs8nmg$mm9$1@dont-email.me>
 <f5b3464a-21de-4d75-858a-054178434d54@googlegroups.com>
 <qsbels$msu$1@dont-email.me> <qsbfn2$12it$1@gioia.aioe.org>
 <qsbnqh$j30$1@dont-email.me> <qsbu56$18iv$1@gioia.aioe.org>
 <qsed22$93u$1@dont-email.me> <qsee2v$par$1@gioia.aioe.org>
 <qsfu02$j84$1@dont-email.me> <qsg203$1soi$1@gioia.aioe.org>
 <qsioca$nf2$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <e8b08246-fc21-4988-b4d9-778dbe6f6d7b@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Type naming conventions: Any_Foo
From: Shark8 <onewingedshark@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2019 14:31:56 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:57695
Date: 2019-12-08T06:31:56-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Sunday, December 8, 2019 at 4:55:57 AM UTC-7, Jeffrey R. Carter wrote:
> 
> >> As I have presented here in the past a proof of concept of a GUI library that 
> >> uses no access types, this is demonstrably false.
> > 
> > Yes, I remember you did, but I also remember that it was not really usable.
> 
> I implemented several examples using the it, and found it quite usable, and the 
> resulting code much easier to understand than typeical GUIs.
> 
> However, the point in contention was your claim that you are required to use 
> access types to have a GUI. When that was demonstrated to be untrue, you 
> attempted to change the subject. So I consider this discussion finished.

I'm rather interested in this no-access-type library idea.
Would it be easier to do with, say, an Ada implementation of Display PostScript?