From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,b9e1cb4c8c3d0d7f X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news.glorb.com!cyclone1.gnilink.net!gnilink.net!wns13feed!worldnet.att.net!attbi_s52.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: "Steve" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada References: <10095813.DNUPcIA2bI@linux1.krischik.com> Subject: Re: Wiki on Ada X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.21.42.251 X-Complaints-To: abuse@comcast.net X-Trace: attbi_s52 1099798538 24.21.42.251 (Sun, 07 Nov 2004 03:35:38 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2004 03:35:38 GMT Organization: Comcast Online Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2004 03:35:38 GMT Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:6026 Date: 2004-11-07T03:35:38+00:00 List-Id: After reading the Programming:Ada description, which has a mix half truths and misconceptions, it makes me wonder: Does Wikibooks have any sort of reputation for accuracy? If it does, some work needs to be done. If it is generally recognized as half truths and misconceptions, then it is probably not worth correcting. Steve (The Duck) "Martin Krischik" wrote in message news:10095813.DNUPcIA2bI@linux1.krischik.com... > Hello, > > There are two main Entries for Ada in Wiki: > > http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Ada > http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Programming:Ada > > But they could do with some improvements. Especially the Wikibooks Entry. > > And it is very easy: Just grab a *random* keyword which which has no article > yet and write something about it. Everybody can do that. > > With Regards > > Martin > -- > mailto://krischik@users.sourceforge.net > http://www.ada.krischik.com