comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Norman Worth <nworth@comcastNOSPAM.net>
Subject: Re: Ada 95 Timers: Any Alternatives Available, Storage, Efficiency, Reliability, Accuracy, Et Cetera Issues?
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 10:25:15 -0600
Date: 2019-06-11T10:25:15-06:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <euudnQad0_FxSGLBnZ2dnUU7-RPNnZ2d@giganews.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <glabgtFkijoU1@mid.individual.net>

Niklas Holsti wrote:
> On 19-05-30 16:57 , Felix_The_Cat@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> What are the limitations of the "with Timer;" in Ada 95?
> 
> Not understood. There is no standard "package Timer" in Ada 95 (nor 
> other Ada standards, AFAIK).
> 
>> I want to simply do something in the Ada code when the timer
>> counts down to 0.
> 
> That sounds like some HW timer. Normally you would not use those 
> directly, but instead use the "delay" or "delay until" statements, to 
> wait until the actual time when something should be done, and let the 
> compiler and run-time system handle the HW timers.
> 
It sounds like you want to use a delay statement.  If you just want to 
wait until the timer expires, a simply delay will do.  If you want to do 
something during the delay, use a task with a delay statement in an entry.


      parent reply	other threads:[~2019-06-11 16:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-30 13:57 Ada 95 Timers: Any Alternatives Available, Storage, Efficiency, Reliability, Accuracy, Et Cetera Issues? Felix_The_Cat@gmail.com
2019-05-30 15:34 ` Niklas Holsti
2019-05-30 16:20   ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2019-06-11 16:25   ` Norman Worth [this message]
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox