From: "Hibou57 (Yannick Duchêne)" <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr>
Subject: Re: Record representation : components order
Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 19:57:06 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2009-07-05T19:57:06-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f43584b9-354a-491e-b838-8325fbcafeb1@h2g2000yqg.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: uocrz6wzy.fsf@stephe-leake.org
On 5 juil, 16:10, Stephen Leake <stephen_le...@stephe-leake.org>
wrote:
> [...]
> If your application requires a specific component order, you must
> specify the order in a record representation clause.
>
> Anything else is compiler dependent.
> [...]
> --
> -- Stephe
And so the two document pointed in the second part of this thread are
wrong ? Finally if its true, the RM does not miss any details and one
must strictly rely on it and nothing else.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-06 2:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-04 21:08 Record representation : components order Hibou57 (Yannick Duchêne)
2009-07-05 3:14 ` Hibou57 (Yannick Duchêne)
2009-07-05 10:16 ` sjw
2009-07-06 7:33 ` Stephen Leake
2009-07-07 19:37 ` sjw
2009-07-09 9:28 ` Stephen Leake
2009-07-09 19:16 ` sjw
2009-07-10 5:26 ` Stephen Leake
2009-07-06 7:29 ` Stephen Leake
2009-07-06 8:07 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2009-07-05 14:10 ` Stephen Leake
2009-07-06 2:57 ` Hibou57 (Yannick Duchêne) [this message]
2009-07-06 8:27 ` Jacob Sparre Andersen
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox