From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.szaf.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: How to get Ada to ?cross the chasm??
Date: Fri, 11 May 2018 10:04:27 +0300
Organization: Tidorum Ltd
Message-ID: <flktjrF18a2U1@mid.individual.net>
References: <322f9b26-01de-4753-bb50-6ef2f3d993d8@googlegroups.com>
 <87a7th9pd1.fsf@nightsong.com>
 <bbda04b9-0f91-47c5-9193-279b667f503c@googlegroups.com>
 <87h8no1nli.fsf@nightsong.com> <pcg2cc$h52$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
 <874ljo1hvy.fsf@nightsong.com> <pcg6u7$hjr$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
 <87vac4z2lh.fsf@nightsong.com> <pcimtl$2o5$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
 <87lgcszjdn.fsf@nightsong.com> <pcvua5$cje$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
 <pd11pn$n72$1@dont-email.me> <87sh6z1kkg.fsf@nightsong.com>
 <b169fddab8os90eqcnhm6ln2f30belp0ib@4ax.com> <87k1sb1dt3.fsf@nightsong.com>
 <fljrhvFove7U1@mid.individual.net> <87h8nfyu40.fsf@nightsong.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: individual.net Un5AhHvltP9CQI7+gE4ppA9wiLADh8ps12nXUmm0b6z5RN3kKY
Cancel-Lock: sha1:os1Ild/jSFYY5TboLrTi72OxsmA=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:45.0)
 Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
In-Reply-To: <87h8nfyu40.fsf@nightsong.com>
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:52243
Date: 2018-05-11T10:04:27+03:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 18-05-11 02:21 , Paul Rubin wrote:
> Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> writes:
>> The CBSG could perhaps be redesigned to isolate the DSL part into
>> separate packages so that only those packages would need to be
>> recompiled.
>
> It is already designed like that.  The package containing those phrases
> is the one that takes 1.5 minutes to recompile on the ARM.  Recompiling
> the rest of the packages would add even more time, though not that much
> more since they are smaller.  The package with the phrases is about 2
> KLOC or 100KB, and most of it is string constants, so I have no idea why
> its compilation is that slow.

Perhaps the compiler is being asked to optimise the code, which is 
probably useless for this package. Try it with very low optimisation level?

-- 
Niklas Holsti
Tidorum Ltd
niklas holsti tidorum fi
       .      @       .