From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,76ec5d55630beb71 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-06-02 08:07:55 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!cyclone.bc.net!tdsnet-transit!newspeer.tds.net!news.binc.net!kilgallen From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada 200X Date: 2 Jun 2003 10:07:52 -0500 Organization: LJK Software Message-ID: References: <3EDAD07A.3010200@attbi.com> <1054562949.551399@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> <1054565992.652258@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1054566453 12452 192.135.80.34 (2 Jun 2003 15:07:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 15:07:33 +0000 (UTC) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:38363 Date: 2003-06-02T10:07:52-05:00 List-Id: In article <1054565992.652258@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>, Hyman Rosen writes: > Vinzent Hoefler wrote: >> Yes, but who is the ancestor? You always have to look for that. > > That's fine. I'm given to understand that Ada is meant to be > for the convenience of the reader, not the writer. It may be > more work for you to look up the ancestor, but then the reader > of the code will know exactly where to look for the code. But Ada is also designed to catch errors made by the writer, and if a new parent is inserted the procedure in question will will be skipping a generation when that would be quite undesired in most cases.