comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: wayned@cpcug.org (Wayne Dernoncourt)
Subject: Re: Eiffel for DoD development?
Date: 20 Sep 1994 07:10:38 -0400
Date: 1994-09-20T07:10:38-04:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <g5WSkakPrwVQ070yn@cpcug.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 34qal9$6s2@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM

In article <34qal9$6s2@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM>,
dweller@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM (David Weller) wrote:

 > I don't understand how a precedent could be set.  The DoD
 > requires usage of Ada except in cases where significant cost
 > savings could be demonstrated across the life cycle.  Aside from
 > some rather pedantic features, Ada 9X offers _at least_ as much
 > functionality as Eiffel.  (Flame bait! :-)
 > _Especially_ for real-time control and monitoring systems.  

I thought Ada was mandated only for embedded combat software, things like
test sets, etc. were excluded from having to be written in Ada.  Has DoD
changed their tune and will now force new business system software, etc. to
be written in Ada.  You should understand that were I work, we have a
group that writes business systems and still does it all in COBOL. 
Thankfully, I'm not a member of that group.<grin>

-- 
Take care      |   This clown speaks for himself, his job doesn't
Wayne D.       |   pay for this, etc. (directly anyway)



  reply	other threads:[~1994-09-20 11:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <DERWAY.94Aug31155314@alumni.ndc.com>
     [not found] ` <ROCK.94Sep3181528@twratl.atlanta.twr.com>
     [not found]   ` <1994Sep9.072456.1302@gtewd.mtv.gtegsc.com>
1994-09-09 18:48     ` Eiffel for DoD development? (Was Re: Why Commit to Eiffel?) David Weller
1994-09-20 11:10       ` Wayne Dernoncourt [this message]
1994-09-20 14:26         ` Eiffel for DoD development? Ted Dennison
1994-09-20 17:18         ` Robert Dewar
1994-09-24 18:44         ` Fred McCall
1994-09-30 13:38           ` Kevin Weise
1994-10-03 23:01             ` Richard Riehle
1994-10-04  5:18               ` Gregory Aharonian
1994-10-04 14:49                 ` Robert Dewar
1994-10-04 19:24                 ` Dave Ceely
     [not found]               ` <CxAypC.CpH@actrix.gen.nz>
     [not found]                 ` <EACHUS.94Oct7145734@spectre.mitre.org>
     [not found]                   ` <jws-1102940843050001@seeker.tiac.net>
1994-10-11 10:05                     ` Robert I. Eachus
     [not found]                 ` <373uv0$fgm@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM>
     [not found]                   ` <CxCCv0.999@actrix.gen.nz>
1994-10-11 13:17                     ` Robb Nebbe
     [not found]                 ` <376tq0$84b@dayuc.dayton.saic.com>
     [not found]                   ` <jws-1102941650060001@seeker.tiac.net>
     [not found]                     ` <377864$tv@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM>
1994-10-12 11:20                       ` Joseph Skinner
1994-10-14 20:02                         ` Richard Riehle
     [not found]                       ` <jws-1202940906260001@seeker.tiac.net>
     [not found]                         ` <37942s$8b1@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM>
1994-10-12 13:12                           ` David Emery
     [not found]                       ` <CxEuJv.B2L@ois.com>
     [not found]                         ` <379632$9to@starbase.neosoft.com>
1994-10-13 11:42                           ` Robert M. Wilkinson
1994-10-13 14:28                             ` Robert Dewar
1994-09-22 15:19 gjennings
     [not found] <376a55$5af@Starbase.NeoSoft.COM>
1994-10-12 11:38 ` Fred McCall
     [not found] <9410101353.AA03104@neptune.sware.com>
1994-10-12 17:48 ` David Emery
     [not found] <CD5F9E2E029D1B76@-SMF->
1994-10-14 12:35 ` HElliott
1994-10-14 17:33   ` Thomas Hood 913-4501
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1994-10-22 21:12 Test Account
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox