From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,deac256a05c84a59 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Nick Roberts Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: DOM and SAX parsing in Ada Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 19:55:55 +0000 Message-ID: References: <41900010.D28DD400@boeing.com> <9CWjd.17305$5K2.1356@attbi_s03> <1106223415.857525.176640@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> <41F4DB6F.4090909@mailinator.com> <35nh12F4oe4caU1@individual.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: individual.net QSjemHCAiS8Ge+JHO0gJqQyF73SfZ6zk5EPyRy5S6p7qCc7uQ= X-Orig-Path: not-for-mail User-Agent: Gemini/1.45d (Qt/3.3.2) (Windows-XP) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:8021 Date: 2005-01-27T19:55:55+00:00 List-Id: Brian May wrote: > ... > The implication here is if you move the project to sourceforge, you can't > control who contributes changes to the code. > > This is not true, even if you place a CVS repository on sourceforge > (optional step) you can still control who has write access, and make sure > the only people who have write access have signed the agreement. I am merely reporting what was my understanding of what the AdaCore employee was telling me. He warned me that it might be impractical (even if theoretically possible) to obtain the necessary signed agreement from all contributors to a SourceForge project. (Again, I hope I'm recalling the gist of the exchange correctly.) -- Nick Roberts