From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,deac256a05c84a59 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!newsfeed-00.mathworks.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Nick Roberts Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: DOM and SAX parsing in Ada Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 15:25:43 +0000 Message-ID: References: <41900010.D28DD400@boeing.com> <9CWjd.17305$5K2.1356@attbi_s03> <1106223415.857525.176640@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> <41F4DB6F.4090909@mailinator.com> <35nh12F4oe4caU1@individual.net> <35t2u6F4qc335U1@individual.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: individual.net pAVkaWb0OBoPCZz+MYInCg9NEojjbZnUZU6nr7oqSjjPH1nsI= X-Orig-Path: not-for-mail User-Agent: Gemini/1.45d (Qt/3.3.2) (Windows-XP) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:8056 Date: 2005-01-28T15:25:43+00:00 List-Id: "Steve" wrote: > Actually XML/Ada does support validation, I'm using it. > > Set_Feature( tree_reader, Validation_Feature, TRUE); > > I don't know whether or not the implementation is buggy, but I do know > that it has worked in the cases I have tested. Sorry, that was a misapprehension on my part. I've been taking another look at the DOM interface (of XML/Ada 1.0), and I really am convinced that my own interface is significantly better (more concise, more efficient), so I'm going to go ahead and develop it. Perhaps what I'll do is to get it working minimally as quickly as I can, post it somewhere public, and see if anyone likes it. It is really an alternative to the DOM, rather than direct competition. -- Nick Roberts