From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,caabf5265fad78e5
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!xlned.com!feeder1.xlned.com!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!193.141.40.65.MISMATCH!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!npeer-ng0.de.kpn-eurorings.net!feed.news.schlund.de!schlund.de!news.online.de!not-for-mail
From: Albrecht =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=E4fer?= <albrecht_kaefer@yahoo.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: unsigned type
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2009 17:08:23 +0200
Organization: 1&1 Internet AG
Message-ID: <h2ful7$3in$1@online.de>
References: <MJS1m.405325$4m1.207186@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
  <h2919r$8ua$1@aioe.org>
 <Yw_1m.93774$d36.55288@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
  <4a48968a$0$31863$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net>
 <K592m.407842$4m1.248858@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
  <k05d2h.oej.ln@hunter.axlog.fr>
 <5a816055-f447-42b5-9d7c-ab36d9f8c262@j32g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
 <jk5f2h.lml.ln@hunter.axlog.fr>
NNTP-Posting-Host: p54bcad8f.dip0.t-ipconnect.de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: online.de 1246461416 3671 84.188.173.143 (1 Jul 2009 15:16:56 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@einsundeins.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 15:16:56 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US;
 rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090403 SeaMonkey/1.1.16 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0
 Hamster-Pg/1.25.2.0
In-Reply-To: <jk5f2h.lml.ln@hunter.axlog.fr>
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:6785
Date: 2009-07-01T17:08:23+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Jean-Pierre Rosen schrieb:
>>> So it is not a bug, it doesn't prove that the index is natural, it's
>>> just the intended behaviour, designed in a way that makes user's life
>>> easier - at the cost of compiler writers' life.
>> As a compiler writer, PLEASE TELL ME YOU DIDN'T MEAN THAT LAST PART
>> LITERALLY!!!!!!!
> Well, it is a shorthand for "at the cost of making the compiler writer's
> life easier". That's what you get for being lazy :-)

*blush*
Now I get it. The way some people interpret things ...


Albrecht