From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.unit0.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: hreba Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: How can one record component be local and another not? Date: Tue, 5 May 2020 14:55:01 +0200 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: individual.net 84dFdq5gYUrrSk/bi29g5AeR787sdOUXC+p4bawn59yKD3i2xY Cancel-Lock: sha1:tWK/RdfnV5siF0NsJmd74ODlD0Q= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: de-DE Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:58583 Date: 2020-05-05T14:55:01+02:00 List-Id: On 5/5/20 1:43 PM, AdaMagica wrote: > Das ganze Konstrukt sieht sehr gefährlich aus! Copies will not point to the correct component: > > A, B: Rec; > > A := B; -- Peng! > That is easy to solve: In my real application, Rec would be private anyway, so it could be made limited, and Init would be changed into a constructor function with result Rec. But first I wanted to solve (and understand) that local/non-local issue. -- Frank Hrebabetzky, Kronach +49 / 9261 / 950 0565