From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_20 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Doctor Who Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: The Ravenscar profile and capabilities paradigm Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 08:42:26 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <07f8mgdot9tmh8mqen2ogd5dds2gojoleh@4ax.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="029ba4d39744cc2f920d1f90b5831eec"; logging-data="16334"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18tOmYPXyU48dcnN3TZZzO+" User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 Cancel-Lock: sha1:lntnt3esbLSUu9JWYuxKoznVxZs= Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:62970 List-Id: On Tue, 12 Oct 2021 12:17:00 +0700, Richard Iswara wrote: >On 12/10/2021 02.50, Doctor Who wrote: >> On Mon, 11 Oct 2021 20:36:46 +0100, "Luke A. Guest" >> wrote: >> >>> On 11/10/2021 20:25, Doctor Who wrote: >>>> On Mon, 11 Oct 2021 15:48:37 +0100, "Luke A. Guest" >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 11/10/2021 14:33, Doctor Who wrote: >>>>>> Hello, >>>>>> someone knows how to introduce the capabilities paradigm in Ada, >>>>>> specifically for programs written using the Ravenscar profile ? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Capabilities are just a set of operations that an object / user can >>>>> perform, or not. So, it's merely a bitset. A bitset which can form >>>>> derived bitsets. >>>>> >>>> >>>> no it is another thing, >>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capability-based_security >>>> >>> >>> I know what it is. It is still a set of bits, or, permissions, or >>> capabilities. The capabilities are usually provided by the OS services. >>> >>> But as you didn't specify whether you wanted to map onto an existing OS' >>> capabilities or if you wanted to implement your own, I went with the latter. >> >> there isn't any existing OS that provides capability-security from the >> ground up, I intend to implement my own. >> >seL4? The whitepaper includes the proofs also. eh yes, I forgot seL4, however it isn't much used I think