From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on ip-172-31-65-14.ec2.internal X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,NICE_REPLY_A, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!news.szaf.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Niklas Holsti Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Broadcast / iterate to all Connection objects via Simple Components? Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 20:37:55 +0200 Organization: Tidorum Ltd Message-ID: References: <392dd5d3-4df1-403f-b703-ee6f750dbc81n@googlegroups.com> <02802bf3-fc29-44da-bd79-21f26d122203n@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: individual.net bSClCTmU/x7/ZlSg02KcIwbnbkqS4DUN4NKOLUkJsHP+k43ZbG Cancel-Lock: sha1:NLF/d9QEjDFaP8D+oZgXOLJ1MVM= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.6.1 Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:64936 List-Id: On 2023-02-15 12:57, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: > Clearly co-routine and OS thread have different properties as > implementations of same concept of a "thread of control." I've been asking you to explain how those different properties would be visible to an Ada programmer who wants to use co-routines. That is, how would Ada co-routines differ from Ada tasks *for an Ada programmer*, but so far I've seen no answer from you that I find understandable. I think we can stop here.