From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Simon Clubley Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Point a beginner in the right direction? Cheap bare-board to run with a RTOS for running ADA Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 12:56:44 +0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <8a3093bb-90b3-4081-9b0b-dfde5aa6b851@googlegroups.com> <993despcuk1d.1ifczvyo501px.dlg@40tude.net> <51da9a80$0$6561$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> Injection-Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 12:56:44 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org; posting-host="3a7522c45acd2a6c162b080668fa4020"; logging-data="24423"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+VyUfc/2F4Mwi/9uCEdYd1w82YkkSx6T0=" User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (VMS/Multinet) Cancel-Lock: sha1:sT5CX/LV+pbCvVEAORNZJjRjUxI= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:16156 Date: 2013-07-08T12:56:44+00:00 List-Id: On 2013-07-08, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote: > On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 12:54:56 +0200, G.B. wrote: > >> Non-modern hardware is as cheap as a plastic spoon! > > That is why it is not available. Fetch me an i486 board. > >> Price is a convincing argument when the effect of the embedded >> system is simple. > > Not really. In fact embedded boards are far more expensive than consumer's > boards. An industrial Atom board has the price of a complete PC with ten > times more memory and higher performance. > If that's what you think, then it's time for you to become enlightened, Dmitry. :-) Start here: https://www.olimex.com/Products/ When people come to comp.lang.ada and talk about wanting to learn Ada and get it running in a bare metal environment, then quite often they are talking about these types of boards, not the safety critical ones with a price tag to match. Not everyone needs the industrial type boards you obviously need during your work, and there is a _vast_ embedded world of which your industrial type environment is only a small part. >> If Ada vendors wish to loose all but the market for expensive high >> end systems, then that's their choice. > > It is not their choice. It is the board vendors who determine what is in > the BSP. No Ada vendor has the resources to port it on every possible > board. > There's nothing to stop a end user programmer writing their own BSP; this appears to be a common capability for RTOS environments. I've written 2-3 BSPs for RTEMS over the years. Simon. -- Simon Clubley, clubley@remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP Microsoft: Bringing you 1980s technology to a 21st century world